|
The
Internet, MP3, Napster. Simple, inexpensive means for enabling the
storage, in bits, and the transmission, in bits per second, of any
audio information.
Easy replication
of music, easy transmission and no barriers to the exchange. The
result: information freely accessible to larger numbers of people.
Should be a good opportunity to have a larger potential market.
But, not all of the additional audience is interested in paying
for the information. Of course, observers claim critics do not buy
music. But there cannot possibly be a market full of critics causing
the shortfall.
As with any form of commerce, the stepping stone to profitable
exchange starts with recognition of a particular good or service.
The creator has not abandoned the work and thus the economic value
of the work needs to be established in the marketplace.
Because music can be characterized in quality terms (AM radio, MP3,
CD), freshness (live, recorded), recorded versions, as well as the
uniqueness of a particular performance (Madison Square Garden 1980)
there is a lot of room for artists and their managers to get busy
identifying profitable market opportunities, and seizing them.
Fact: All industries will sooner or later need to evaluate the open
accessibility of value-added information. Increasingly it is information
alone which differentiates between the strength of a particular
company vis-a-vis its competitors. Design, sales lists, distribution
plans are all information valuable to any given corporation. The
cost of advertising is likely to rise at a rate much faster than
other costs as recognition gives the chance for a sale. For musicians,
the market is "easily" defined as those who want to pay for the
work of the artists.
The music business just happens to be the first where the
value-added information, or music, has been de-coupled from the
means of distribution.
Seventy years ago, radio was intended to provide wireless communications
points for consumers. The cost benefit versus laying and maintaining
wires was deemed opportunistic. The initial stations for radio broadcast
were thus intended as wireless communications ports, while the ability
for third parties to listen in on a transmission was thought of
as an inconvenience. The advantage of radio transmission was economically
powerful. Until business interests recognized an even greater economic
benefit was afforded by radio transmission in aggregating "listeners,"
advertising and broadcast industries were incapable of real time
performance. It is with the origination of radio that music was
de-coupled from recognition. Essentially, live performances could
be substituted with radio broadcasts making identification of the
performers more difficult but less expensive than with the promotion
and sale of phonographs. That the business of selling music was
able to relate performance to the sale of prerecorded songs regards
the value that is bound in an easily recorded, stored or broadcasted
signal.
Recognition continues to be the single most important aspect
of selling any good or service. That radio sells CDs is well known
but rarely analyzed.
How many stations state the name of the artist and song? How quickly
do listeners convert a listening experience into a purchase? The
Internet represents similar barriers to the successful marketing
and sale of music as all of the previous formats for both storage
and transmission of audio signals. That a network can offer both
prerecorded and broadcast versions of the same signal is an issue
of significance: why is the stored version any different from the
streamed version? The difference is that while perfect copies are
possible, the breadth and variety of music now available is likely
to have more difficulty in finding an audience: stored or streamed.
The anticipated debate over rights between two very profitable industries
seems to hinge on an old concept. To the chagrin of computer-related
interests seeking to "restrict" use of content on digital platforms,
with concepts such as digital rights management (DRM) and "trusted
systems," media companies maintain consistence on the single issue
evident since the advent of consumer electronic devicesresponsibility
over copies.
|